Confronting African Involvement in The Slave Trade

Many people who read dispassionate accounts of slavery are invariably appalled and shocked by the cruelty that accompanied the commoditization and sale of human beings by others. The phenomenon of slavery is one that makes me take a step back to ask where ethics and markets intersect. And any knowledgeable person also knows that the US paid a huge price in the Civil War before the issue was resolved in part. Many people in the US accept the moral error that led to the enslavement of Africans shipped onto the continent and were owned by a number of families and individuals.  An enduring though impractical argument has been that some reparations are due to the descendants of the slaves on account of this moral crime.

In this article, Henry Louis Gates Jr. has confronted the less acknowledged side to the story of the huge market of slavery before abolition in Europe and the American continents. That truth is that a large number of African kingdoms willingly conducted raids and built fortunes through running huge slave markets. As the article reiterates, most of the slave merchants simply appeared on the ports and few ever entered into the interior in large numbers. Understandably, this complicates the demand for reparations because all of Africa has cast itself as a victim of the great injustice based entirely on racial prejudice. Still, I find that while Henry Louis Gates Jr. has exposed the ability of Africans to stand eyeball to eyeball with the contradiction with the main powers from Europe bearing most of the shame. The missing story is that of Arab collaboration in the slavery movement especially in the North and eastern coasts of Africa. To my mind, too often the equally brutal role of the Arabs in Africa is easily forgotten or subsumed in the story about the transatlantic slavery. Unlike the professor, I am less confident that President Obama's involvement will end the blame game and so I only wager that the history be taught with high fidelity to facts.