Absurdity of Gene Patenting Demonstrated

Following my blog post here on the judgement that gave a much appreciated push-back against broad patenting of genes, I have come across a number of other comments on the implications. Ben Goldacre's article in the Guardian makes me revisit the question because he cites a data-based study that demonstrated the absurdity of allowing such broad ownership over pre-existing genetic matter in humans. In short, the paper that he cites suggests that the patenting of this single genetic sequence makes it impossible to conduct research not only on breast cancer but on a wide number of other genes in every human being. In short, the genetic sequence and its components occur so regularly that it extends to virtually every gene in every single human being.  If one needed evidence from data and basic science that this form of patenting is absurd, then there it is.