Another Reason not to Buy Expensive Sneakers

I have run a city marathon in the tropics on two consecutive occasions a couple of years ago and learnt that running the marathon is an extremely painful endurance event. Because I ran as a full amateur and with less than a week of training, I was quite pleased to have done it in time slightly less than four hours. Another of the major mistakes that I and my brother made was to purchase moderately costly running shoes just before the race day. Needless to mention, the shoes were comfortable for the first ten kilometres and a real pain for the rest of the race. Blisters are common for professional runners too but to have lost toe nails is evidence of that imprudence because there are things even the best running shoes would not give.

Karen Knee's book review looks at states the argument by the author that running unshod is the perfect way to run comfortably over distances while avoiding injury. Christopher McDougal writes in the book that he took up running years back and over time came to realize that the Tarahumara are able to maintain pace and cover long distances not only because of their innate ability but because they run in flat rubber sandals. Other biological evidence show that the human species is specifically engineered for long distance running because of the ability to dissipate heat through sweat and that the pace of breathing is also independent of stride. In addition, it states that the upright posture is complimented with tendons which enable the human head to stay upright while running.

The book reviewer has made the book's arguments really well and I find the thesis really fascinating. Still, when I run the marathon again in October of this year, I will recall all this but remember that running shoes can still be very comfortable even if unnatural and predisposing towards injury. In the long run, I still will prefer running shoes. Are Nike's sports shoes engineers listening?