Rolling Stone Assesses the War on Drugs

Ben Wallace-Wells of Rolling Stone magazine dissects the effects of the War on drugs and laments the great waste of nearly half a trillion US dollars. Essentially, it argues correctly that the war on drugs has little to show for the enormous sums spent, property destroyed and lives consumed. For anyone with a little exposure to dispassionate analysis of both the theory and the examination of the empirical facts, this is not new but is a pointer to what ideologically-driven policy often leads to: disaster and waste of resources.

As if this requires repaet on this blog, I will rehash what is clearly evident from that piece and others. First, the best approach to narcotics use reduction policy should concentrate not on outright ban but on treatment of addicts who consume a disproportionate amount of the drugs. A second lesson is that manufacture, distribution and retail of drugs requires a highly organized corporate structure and is often responsive to changes and effects of the eradication efforts. Disruption of supply simply drives up price in the short term and this creates an incentive for increased supply while wrong theories are used to keep the fight going. Finally, as stated in the book Freakonomics, the gangs make a deliberate calculation about when to confront their competitors and when cooperation is more desirable. There's no reason to work harder at a failed policy.