I did not record it on this blog but it occurred to me that the tough bargain that Apple reached with the publishers on e-books was potentially troublesome. At the time, the idea was that publishers wanted an alternative that ensured that they maintained control of the cost of e-books in the quest to break the perceived stranglehold on the market by Amazon. Notwithstanding my admiration for Apple, I support the enquiry by the US Department of Justice with the claim that Apple and the publishers colluded to fix prices and thereby raise their revenues in way that was harmful to buyers.
Brian Balker of the Guardian provides the background together with details of the claim by the US Government here. In spite of my reluctance to support government intervention against businesses, I think that this has sufficient justification. To start with, Amazon had placed most publishers in a place where they were the prices of e-books were moving towards marginal cost. The agreement that forms the justification for this suit ensured that publishers maintained the bizarre pricing that made no sense to anyone else but the few publishers. Since then, even Amazon has had to be more cautious in pricing books because it could have been isolated since the iPad gave substantial power to Apple.
Brian Balker of the Guardian provides the background together with details of the claim by the US Government here. In spite of my reluctance to support government intervention against businesses, I think that this has sufficient justification. To start with, Amazon had placed most publishers in a place where they were the prices of e-books were moving towards marginal cost. The agreement that forms the justification for this suit ensured that publishers maintained the bizarre pricing that made no sense to anyone else but the few publishers. Since then, even Amazon has had to be more cautious in pricing books because it could have been isolated since the iPad gave substantial power to Apple.
No comments:
Post a Comment