This brings the discussion to the next "Home Teams", which are the teams from the host continent of Africa. Here too, as the SPI showed, few of them performed in a way that would suggest that African football is on a definitive rise as a force to be reckoned with in international soccer. And yet most African teams won only a single match at best and Cameroon, lost all its matches at the group stage. Apart from falling for cheap baiting by other teams, the African teams showed the inability to stay composed under pressure in addition to woeful finishing by strikers. The redeeming thing about African soccer during this tournament remains the goalkeepers who prevented them from conceding dozens of goals. Otherwise, the objective view must be that African soccer still has to resolve systemic weaknesses in team selection, managing player composure during intense pressure and better command from the skippers. Notwithstanding Ghana's qualification for the round of 16 and subsequent elimination of team USA, I do not think that it redeems the overall poor performance by the five African teams.
Finally, the fact that none of the finalists in the preceding tournament reached the round of 16 shows that four years can alter the dynamics of competition substantially. Tactics aside, I think that both France and Italy had fairly aged players though that alone cannot explain the inability to play decently. Whatever the internal divisions in either squad, they did not deserve to play beyond the first three matches.
No comments:
Post a Comment