Judging from the surfeit of press and other commentary on Japan, one would get the erroneous impression that following the joint collapse of Japanese financial institutions and property markets in the late 1990's, that economy has remained perpetually in limbo. In this article, Eamon Fingleton provides proper perspective to the issue through reminders that perception is starkly different from reality. While I have never visited Japan, most of what I watch shows that the citizens of that country enjoy a very high standard of living.
While it is true that Japanese corporations that dominated financial and technology markets ceded their position to other corporations, the economic adjustment within Japan did not cause a collapse. True, the rate of growth has not been high, but Japanese incomes have kept an upward creep and in some areas, the quality of technology and other services available within Japan are the enviable standards. While being cautious about Eamon's claims, it is still relevant to mention that Japan's early growth was sufficiently sound to ensure that the painful adjustments due to the property and bank crashes did not devastate its citizens. in short, Japan may not have caught up with the United States but its standards of living are still high and other fast growing countries would accomplish a lot by just getting to where Japan is.
I am less sanguine about the argument that the citizens took a conscious decision to keep very low population growth. It is clear that the demographic position as it exists would soon have adverse effects on the growth of that country. It may well be that its economic policies were mostly sound but the desire to maintain strict racial homogeneity may be attractive social and cultural policy but is surely disastrous economic policy. Its time for Japan to review that because this is perhaps its most pressing policy failure today.
No comments:
Post a Comment