To my mind, Dani Rodrik is without doubt one of the foremost Development Economists and one to whom I take time to read even when I do not agree or understand his points about the government's role in development. Among his consistent and lucid ideas is the view that industrial policy does have arole to lay in the growth and ultimate development of a country. Having seen the vast number of failed attempts at driving the economy through government's choice of growth sectors, I find this view to be more nuanced than either his detractors or others who approve government action do admit.
That notwithstanding, I am always in Rodrik's corner with regard to assessments about the longer term prospects of selected economies. His article on Project Syndicate demonstrates that nuance again by carefully asking for a review of the conventional opinion that emerging countries and developing countries generally are bound to contribute in a large way to growth in the world economy in the future. As he argues, the US and European nations are faced with both systemic and structural problems that require deft management while most of the rest of the world has had comparatively impressive growth over the last decade.
Dani Rodrik asks the important question about whether developing countries can drive forward the world economy. Judging from his well-argued piece, it is possible that hope on the part of commentators appears to triumph over reality and the empirics of the historical record. many of the forecasts about the world transformation away from the west is based on extrapolation of impressive growth in leading countries and even smaller economies of Africa. It is rather naive to expect all these countries to maintain these rates of growth indefinitely. It will be a very difficult task that requires structural reconfiguration of these economies in an way that is not only historically unprecedented but lead to uncomfortable political relations. Irrespective of one's views about the conclusions, the argument is that extrapolation of today's growth rates one way or the other as a substitute of broader analysis is unwise.
That notwithstanding, I am always in Rodrik's corner with regard to assessments about the longer term prospects of selected economies. His article on Project Syndicate demonstrates that nuance again by carefully asking for a review of the conventional opinion that emerging countries and developing countries generally are bound to contribute in a large way to growth in the world economy in the future. As he argues, the US and European nations are faced with both systemic and structural problems that require deft management while most of the rest of the world has had comparatively impressive growth over the last decade.
Dani Rodrik asks the important question about whether developing countries can drive forward the world economy. Judging from his well-argued piece, it is possible that hope on the part of commentators appears to triumph over reality and the empirics of the historical record. many of the forecasts about the world transformation away from the west is based on extrapolation of impressive growth in leading countries and even smaller economies of Africa. It is rather naive to expect all these countries to maintain these rates of growth indefinitely. It will be a very difficult task that requires structural reconfiguration of these economies in an way that is not only historically unprecedented but lead to uncomfortable political relations. Irrespective of one's views about the conclusions, the argument is that extrapolation of today's growth rates one way or the other as a substitute of broader analysis is unwise.
No comments:
Post a Comment